I’m unsure about the execution (voodoo-blackface?) too, but this is a great idea, no?
American televangelist/Christian evangelical ‘douchebag‘ extraordinaire Pat Robertson blamed the catastrophic earthquake in Haiti on the on the Hatian people and their religious/cultural practices– voodoo. Additional article: What is Pat Robertson Really Saying About Haiti?
& here’s my request to johnnyvoodoo and all America voodoo doll makers, please make a doll of this man, David Brooks of the New York Times —
If you read his Op-Ed column last Thursday, I’m sure you will sympathize with me/my request. For a better understanding, Matt Taibbi clears the thickets by translating excerpts of Brooks’s essay so we can further appreciate his timely insight —
“This is not a natural disaster story. This is a poverty story. Itâ€™s a story about poorly constructed buildings, bad infrastructure and terrible public services. On Thursday, President Obama told the people of Haiti: â€œYou will not be forsaken; you will not be forgotten.â€ If he is going to remain faithful to that vow then he is going to have to use this tragedy as an occasion to rethink our approach to global poverty. Heâ€™s going to have to acknowledge a few difficult truths.
The first of those truths is that we donâ€™t know how to use aid to reduce poverty. Over the past few decades, the world has spent trillions of dollars to generate growth in the developing world. The countries that have not received much aid, like China, have seen tremendous growth and tremendous poverty reductions. The countries that have received aid, like Haiti, have not.
In the recent anthology â€œWhat Works in Development?,â€ a group of economists try to sort out what weâ€™ve learned. The picture is grim. There are no policy levers that consistently correlate to increased growth. There is nearly zero correlation between how a developing economy does one decade and how it does the next. There is no consistently proven way to reduce corruption. Even improving governing institutions doesnâ€™t seem to produce the expected results.
The chastened tone of these essays is captured by the economist Abhijit Banerjee: â€œIt is not clear to us that the best way to get growth is to do growth policy of any form. Perhaps making growth happen is ultimately beyond our control.â€
TRANSLATION: Donâ€™t bother giving any money, it doesnâ€™t do any good. And feeling guilty about not giving money doesnâ€™t do anyone any good either. In fact, youâ€™re probably helping by not doing anything.
Read more @ True/Slant